网站LOGO
公爵书房 | 技术分享
页面加载中
10月4日
网站LOGO 公爵书房 | 技术分享
以指键之轻,承载知识之重
菜单
  • 公爵书房 | 技术分享
    以指键之轻,承载知识之重
    用户的头像
    首次访问
    上次留言
    累计留言
    我的等级
    我的角色
    打赏二维码
    打赏博主
    【Stellaris】Dev Diary#307 - Leader Experiments
    点击复制本页地址
    微信扫一扫
    文章二维码
    文章图片 文章标题
    创建时间
  • 一 言
    确认删除此评论么? 确认
  • 本弹窗介绍内容来自,本网站不对其中内容负责。

    【Stellaris】Dev Diary#307 - Leader Experiments

    公爵 · 原创 ·
    P社 · 新闻群星开发者日志
    共 5621 字 · 约 0 分钟 · 80
    本文最后更新于2023年09月01日,已经过了32天没有更新,若内容或图片失效,请留言反馈

    Happy Thursday!

    This week we’re looking at another of our Summer Experiments, though this one unfortunately didn’t work out as well as we had hoped.

    Class-based leader limits

    Why are you looking at this?​

    Galactic Paragons reintroduced a limit to the number of leaders you could recruit at one time, and while it was a soft cap that you could exceed, experience gains were reduced and once you hit twice the cap, all leader experience gain stopped. In subsequent patches, we relaxed some of the numbers and added more ways to increase the cap, but it’s still a rather unpopular system that could use some work.

    Currently, the presence of a less valuable leader (like a General) takes up the same “space” as something like a Scientist or Admiral, which leads to some unsatisfying gameplay decisions.

    I mentioned a few things we were planning on looking at back in Dev Diary #302, along with some of the issues we expected to run into.

    So what did you try?​

    During our experiments we added the ability to have individual leader caps by class, so that General mentioned above would use up General capacity, but Scientists would be governed by their own limit. “Over cap” effects would likewise be per-class, so if you had too many Admirals, their progression would slow, but other leader classes would be unaffected.

    We also experimented with retaining “wild-card” capacity, so you could always get a few over before starting to run into penalties.

    Why didn’t it work?​

    This experiment largely failed due to UX issues. Stellaris isn’t always the easiest game to parse information from, but this turned out diabolically bad and difficult to fix.

    The information transfer is made even harder by Envoys acting as their own “special version” that have their own capacity but behave entirely differently from all of the other leaders.


    It says we have 1 leader out of 3, but we actually have 4 out of 5-8. Oh no.

    1/1 Admirals, 0/1 Generals, 1/2 Scientists, 2/1 Governors, 0/3 Envoys (but actually 3 Envoys, 0 of which are being used), plus the Wildcards. This could possibly have been shown as something like 1/0/1/2 (+2) | (3), but that’s very confusing.​

    Five different leader types plus the wildcard was too difficult to explain clearly in the top bar (where the limited space is a major issue) and even in the expanded space available in tooltips.

    After several variants and some UX design time, we deemed this variant a failure. We could have continued spending time refining this - but decided that we’d rather pursue a greater rework that we’re hoping to release alongside the 3.10 update. (Custodian initiatives do not generally have hard release dates - if it’s not ready by 3.10 freeze, it’ll move out to 3.11.)

    I’ll go into full details after Caelum is released, but the quick summary involves consolidating the five leader classes down to three (Commanders, Diplomats, and Scientists) and reworking how Envoys are used. (As they would be merged into the Diplomat class.)

    Yes, we've had one, yes, but what about second leader rework?​

    Until then, we’re planning on making some adjustments to the over-cap formulas to reduce their negative effects until the greater rework is ready.

    Tell us about Caelum then!​

    Like the Stellaris 3.1 ‘Lem’ update, 3.9 ‘Caelum’ has a lot of general improvements scattered across a great number of game systems.

    Common Ground and Hegemony are getting some improvements:
    Your starting federation members no longer own your immediately neighboring systems, allowing both you and them some room for early expansion.
    The Federation now starts with 0 Cohesion (instead of -100) and halfway to Level 2 (600 XP instead of 0 XP).
    The requirements for the Origins have been relaxed to allow non-genocidal Hive-Minds and Machine Intelligences to take them. This also allows your AI federation members to occasionally spawn as Hive-Minds or Machine Intelligences.

    We also have some balance changes done for Archaeotechs:

    • Halved the energy upkeep of the Facility of Archaeostudies.
    • Added the Archaeotech Focus admiral trait, which grants increased damage and fire rate with Archaeotech weapons.
    • Decreased the research speed and draw weight for Archaeotech from the Expertise trait, but made it reduce the Minor Artifact cost for ship components.
    • The starting head of research for Remnants empires now has the Expertise: Archaeostudies trait.
    • The Archaeoengineers AP now reduces Minor Artifact cost for ship components by 10%
    • Increased the range of Macro Batteries by 50%.

    Next week…​

    Here are some things that we’ll be talking about in the next few weeks:

    Pixelated collage of lots of tooltips that I figure you'll have deciphered by the end of the day. We’ll reveal all of these, and more.​

    We’ll be starting with all the improvements to the Lithoids Species Pack, that are intended on bringing it up to the level of the others..

    See you then!

    声明:本文由 公爵(博主)原创,依据 CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 许可协议 授权,转载请注明出处。

    还没有人喜爱这篇文章呢

    发一条! 发一条!
    博客logo 公爵书房 | 技术分享 以指键之轻,承载知识之重 51统计 百度统计
    MOEICP 萌ICP备20226257号 ICP 赣ICP备2022001242号-1 ICP 闽公网安备35020502000606号 又拍云 本站由又拍云提供CDN加速/云存储服务

    🕛

    本站已运行 1 年 257 天 5 小时 40 分

    🌳

    自豪地使用 Typecho 建站,并搭配 MyLife 主题
    公爵书房 | 技术分享. © 2022 ~ 2023.
    网站logo

    公爵书房 | 技术分享 以指键之轻,承载知识之重
     
     
     
     
    壁纸